Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 510 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dangerous caches? #1745579

    I agree that comments attacking you for your comments are unwarranted. I think everyone else was just trying to offer opinions and be funny so please take no offense at the one that seems a bit too personal – I am sure that they probably have not done the cache in question.
    For those of us that have done it, yes it does have some hazards that my caching group did not anticipate that day. We considered not doing it but we were already there – what else can I say .
    I have always thought some standard warnings if hazards are present should be included in the cache description but if not I always try to leave them in my comments on the cache.
    Thorson once told me that geocachers are nice friendly people and he is correct from all that I have met.

    in reply to: RPaske Hitting Fives #1735639

    Great job on 500!!
    Okay – which one was your favorite?

    in reply to: mostpeople reach second centennial mark #1735637

    25th group to make 200 – congrats!

    in reply to: Dangerous caches? #1745575

    I agree that all caches are not for everyone. I think at times, all of us are kind in our comments on the various caches so as not to offend those who placed them.
    My thought is – if the cache has some hazards – post them.
    Cortaid takes care of the poison ivy, nettles only sting for about 15 minutes, my tentnus is up to date, I know I shouldn’t wear shorts geocaching but I do and when I get to a cache that only a fool would attempt…… It always seems that the fool logs a find .

    in reply to: badlatitude (300 found) #1735629

    I figured that my totals that I pulled from different caches might not be exact but somehow I missed the Searchers . Sorry.

    in reply to: badlatitude (300 found) #1735626

    Okay I am curious…..

    Sixteen Wisconsin Teams to reach 300 are?

    1-Lil Otter – 2110
    2-Jeff Thorson – 670
    3-Pharmteam – 549
    4-Geotrippers – 517
    5-Trudy & the Beast – 470
    6-RPaske – 468
    7-Socko – 454
    8- SBukosky – 440
    9- Bobcatw98 – 435
    10- Natloh2 – 405
    11- KBraband – 383
    12- Cashew – 371
    13- The Troops – 351
    14- Folktrackers – 310
    15- Badlatitude – 301

    Whose #16 ?

    Granted this is in no way a competition but I do believe we all respect the effort and experience of those who have sought out this many caches. Congrats to everyone listed and those trying to achieve this goal as it is a geocaching badge of honor not a blue ribbon.

    in reply to: Updated Most States List #1745547

    Yes I just took the raw data from the website quoted.
    I would be happy to keep this reminder out there and will make it correct for Wisconsin if those with errors will send me the data.
    Just another fun thing to make us geocache in different areas – as if we needed one.

    in reply to: badlatitude (300 found) #1735623

    Ditto to T&B’s comment!
    300 is a great total – and speaking of which….. How many have made 300 (a question of T&B).

    in reply to: Team Roman Geoskis top 100 #1735583

    Ahhh that first 100. Still has that new car smell to it.
    Congrats!

    in reply to: Natloh2 scores 400th #1735571

    AH, You are one for the best in the area – keep it up! and congrats!

    in reply to: jthorson Second to log 600 #1735568

    Great job Jeff!
    Seems like since first of the year things have really picked up for the top geocachers.

    in reply to: Hotdogs_off_trail log 200th in the rain #1735553

    Congratulations – I think we have all found the evidence of your visits to all the caches.

    in reply to: PharmTeam logs 500th #1735544

    Great job Pharmteam – I don’t know how you do it but it gives us all a goal to keep on trying.

    in reply to: Trudy & the beast top 400! #1735536

    Great job on the “400”.
    Perhaps it was already stated but what was the 400th?

    in reply to: When to retire a cache #1745451

    Old Cachers never retire they just finally own their own coordinates.
    Has anyone ever found a tombstone with the “Final Coordinates” on it?
    Many years from now I would be disappointed if Thorsons final coordinates are not a very hard multi-cache.
    A bit morbid in my thinking tonight I guess but I can imagine a tag behind the stone with new coordinates on it!

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 510 total)